Marina CCO proposal Debate

Operational Considerations - Stakeholder Engagement

Option 2

Residents supporting Option 2 appreciate its potential to balance commercial returns with community values, emphasizing the importance of reinvesting profits back into the Marina to benefit both users and the broader community. However, there are concerns about reduced democratic oversight and public accountability, with suggestions for implementing safeguards to maintain these aspects under the new model. Additionally, there is a strong call for ensuring that community and user group voices are represented within the Asset-Owning CCO to support diverse interests and enhance decision-making processes.

Table of comments:

Point No	Comment
89.4	Noting I do not understand the difference between option 2 and 3
164.4	Don't know enough to be able to answer this fairly
977.4	Sensible and fair
1081.4	Within this model please ensure there is a voice for user groups within the CCO so that the use of the area by community groups is supported in tandem with the provision of services to berth holders.
1085.4	dont' know enough. go with your recommendation
1438.4	Option 2 with reservations. There would be considerably less democratic 'contact' and accountability, unless safeguards are put in place. Using the profits to feed back into the Marina is good - but profits are not everything. Increased fees for marina berth holders must be something that berth holders can 'see', 'understand' and have feedback on. If there are some projects that require a big financial input, it would be approriate for the Council to add funds, including from general ratepayers. Some of the Marina Master Plan proposals were about Marina changes that were to benefit the whole population of Nelson and visitors, not just Marina users. Surely this should be part of Council funding. I certainly agree with continuing with the Asset-Owning Council-Controlled Trading Organisation, I am not sure about transferring all liabilities.There were many good suggestions in the Master Plan. But all the proposals will need more discussion, detailing and planning. Can the small Controlled Organsation manage all this? It could be difficult.
1465.2	Nelson Yacht Club supports Option 2 - to create an Asset-Owning Council Controlled Organisation. There is mention of the ability for the CCO to operate as a Social Enterprise. This is an important factor for our community, who are all stakeholders in the marine environment, navigation safety, and recreational use of our marine areas. The remit of the Marina CCO to create value for our community, not just commercial returns is important. In relation to the “City to the Sea” connection. We feel strongly that the Marina Masterplan redevelopment should not come at the expense of investing in our waterfront, and the Wakefield Quay area that includes the Nelson Yacht Club. There is great potential for the “Haven Precinct”, with a commercial core around The Styx, Custom House, and Anchor Shipping & Foundry buildings, and a recreational zone from there to the yacht club. We would welcome Council engagement on proposals for this area as part of the Long Term Plan process.